Hubra
Back to Journal
Dispatch · Education

What is Liquid Staking? Complete Guide for 2026

Liquid staking lets you earn staking rewards while keeping your assets usable. This guide explains how it works, compares major Solana LSTs, and helps you decide which approach fits your goals.

·7 min read·Hubra Team
StakingDeFiEducation
What is Liquid Staking? Complete Guide for 2026

TL;DR. Liquid staking on Solana lets you earn protocol rewards while holding a transferable receipt token (raSOL, JitoSOL, mSOL, JupSOL, bpSOL). The token count stays fixed; the SOL redemption rate appreciates each epoch as underlying stake earns. APYs cluster at 5 to 6%, with the spread driven by MEV, fees, and validator selection. Choose native staking for the cleanest custody, liquid staking for composability.

You want to stake your SOL to earn yield. But traditional staking locks your assets for days - and if an opportunity comes up, you're stuck.

Liquid staking solves this. You earn staking rewards and keep your assets usable. But here's what most guides won't tell you: not all liquid staking tokens are the same, and the differences matter more than you think.

This guide explains how liquid staking actually works, compares the major Solana LSTs with real data, and helps you decide which approach fits your goals.


How liquid staking works

When you liquid stake, three things happen:

  1. You deposit SOL into a liquid staking protocol
  2. The protocol stakes it to validators and gives you a liquid staking token (LST)
  3. Your LST appreciates in value as staking rewards accrue

Your LST is a receipt for staked SOL. It's not pegged 1:1 forever - it grows relative to SOL over time.

Example: If you deposit 100 SOL today and receive 100 mSOL, in a year that 100 mSOL might be redeemable for ~106 SOL (at current ~6% APY). The mSOL quantity stays the same; its SOL-value increases.

This is called a reward-bearing token - no claiming, no rebasing, just automatic appreciation.


Liquid staking vs native staking

FactorNative StakingLiquid Staking
APY~6-7%~6-6.5% (slightly lower due to protocol fees)
LiquidityLocked 2-3 days to unstakeInstant via DEX swaps
DeFi composabilityNone - locked SOL can't be usedFull - use LST as collateral, in LPs, etc.
Validator choiceYou pick one validatorProtocol distributes across many
RiskValidator performance riskSmart contract risk + validator risk

The honest take: If you're just holding SOL long-term and never need liquidity, native staking to a quality validator gives slightly better APY. But most people underestimate how often they do need liquidity - and liquid staking's flexibility often outweighs the ~0.5% APY difference.


Solana LSTs compared

The major Solana LSTs and what actually distinguishes each one:

TokenProtocolWhat makes it distinct
JitoSOLJitoModified validator client captures MEV; share routes to holders
mSOLMarinadeStake Auction Marketplace lets validators bid for stake; oldest Solana LST, SOC 2 certified
INFSanctumIndex across many LSTs rather than a single staking position; infrastructure-level exposure
JupSOLJupiterCompounded yield routed through Jupiter's DEX aggregator
bpSOLBackpackLST native to the Backpack wallet and exchange
raSOLHubraSingle validator backing (Hubra, operating since 2020) running the Jito client; MEV flows through to stakers alongside base staking rewards

All Solana LST APYs cluster in the 5 to 6% band; the spread comes from the mechanisms in the next section. For live numbers, see Sanctum.

Why the APY differences?

The ~0.5% spread between LSTs isn't random. It comes from:

1. MEV Distribution (Jito) Jito runs modified validator software that captures MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) - essentially, profits from transaction ordering. JitoSOL holders get a share of this. When on-chain activity is high, Jito's effective APY can spike above competitors.

2. Stake Auction Marketplace (Marinade) Marinade's SAM lets validators bid for stake. Higher-performing validators pay more to receive delegations, and that premium flows to mSOL holders. It's a market mechanism that theoretically optimizes for the best validators.

3. Protocol Fees Each protocol takes a cut (typically 5-10% of staking rewards). Lower fees = higher APY for you, but also less protocol revenue for development.

4. Validator Selection How a protocol picks validators affects returns. Some optimize purely for APY; others balance decentralization, uptime, and commission rates.


The Sanctum layer

Here's something most liquid staking guides miss: Sanctum is the infrastructure layer that connects all Solana LSTs.

What this means practically:

  • You can swap between LSTs instantly (mSOL → JitoSOL → raSOL) with minimal slippage
  • New LSTs get instant liquidity by plugging into Sanctum's unified pool
  • No fragmented liquidity - the old problem of "I have mSOL but the opportunity needs JitoSOL" is solved

This is why raSOL, despite being newer, has full liquidity from day one - it's built on Sanctum's infrastructure.


Which LST should you choose?

This depends on what you're optimizing for:

Choose JitoSOL if:

  • You want exposure to MEV upside
  • You believe on-chain activity will stay high
  • You're comfortable with Jito's dominant market position

Choose mSOL if:

  • You value Marinade's track record (oldest Solana LST, SOC 2 certified)
  • You like the SAM auction mechanism
  • You want the most "battle-tested" option

Choose raSOL if:

  • You want a non-custodial home for SOL with yield that compounds in the background
  • You prefer a calm, considered staking experience over hopping between protocols
  • You also stake USDC and prefer one platform for both

The platform approach

If you stake through a platform like Hubra, the specific LST matters less - you hold a liquid position and the platform handles validator selection, restaking, and rewards. What matters most is staying liquid and non-custodial.


Risks to know about

Smart contract risk

Every LST relies on smart contracts. If there's a bug or exploit, staked funds could be at risk. Mitigation: stick to audited, high-TVL protocols.

Depeg risk

In extreme market conditions, LSTs can trade below their "fair" SOL value. This happened briefly with stETH on Ethereum during the 2022 market crash. On Solana, Sanctum's unified liquidity layer reduces this risk significantly - but it's not zero.

Validator slashing

Solana doesn't currently have slashing (validators losing stake for misbehavior), but this could change. If implemented, liquid staking protocols would need to handle slashing events.

Opportunity cost

At ~6% APY, liquid staking is solid but not spectacular. In a bull market with high DeFi yields, you might find better risk-adjusted returns elsewhere. The advantage is that with an LST, you can also pursue those opportunities (e.g., deposit your mSOL as collateral on Kamino).


How to start

The manual way (multiple apps)

  1. Go to jito.network, marinade.finance, or sanctum.so
  2. Connect wallet
  3. Deposit SOL, receive LST
  4. If you want to use it in DeFi, go to Kamino/jupiter separately
  5. Manage positions across multiple dashboards

The Hubra way (focused on staking)

  1. Open hubra.app
  2. Connect wallet
  3. Stake SOL → receive raSOL (or stake USDC for stablecoin yield)
  4. Yield compounds in the background, your keys stay yours

The difference: Hubra is built for staking specifically. SOL and USDC, non-custodial, with the polish people expect from traditional finance - no validator selection, no protocol shopping, no separate dashboards.


FAQ

What APY can I realistically expect? Currently 6-6.5% on Solana. This fluctuates with network inflation and validator performance. Be skeptical of any protocol promising significantly higher - there's usually hidden risk.

Is my SOL safe with liquid staking? Your SOL is delegated to validators, not held by the protocol. The smart contract risk is the main concern. Stick to audited protocols with significant TVL and track record.

Can I lose money? You can't lose your staked SOL principal through normal operation. You can lose relative to holding SOL if the LST temporarily depegs, or if there's a smart contract exploit. Both are rare but not impossible.

How is this different from staking on Coinbase/Binance? CEX staking is custodial - they hold your assets. Liquid staking is non-custodial - you hold the LST in your own wallet. CEXs can freeze withdrawals; with liquid staking, you can swap to SOL on a DEX anytime.

Why not just stake natively for slightly higher APY? If you never need flexibility, native staking is fine. But liquid staking lets you: exit instantly, use your position as collateral, or switch strategies without a 2-3 day wait. That flexibility often justifies the small APY difference.


Bottom line

In 2026, leaving your SOL un-staked means missing ~6% annual yield. With liquid staking, you get that yield without giving up flexibility.

The question isn't whether to liquid stake - it's which approach fits your needs:

  • Maximizing raw yield? Compare JitoSOL vs mSOL APYs and pick the leader
  • Want a calm, non-custodial home for SOL (and USDC)? Stake on Hubra
  • Building a DeFi strategy? Pick an LST with deep integrations (Kamino, Jupiter, etc.)

Whatever you choose, you'll be earning yield while keeping your assets productive. That's the point.


Ready to start? Explore liquid staking on Hubra →


Last updated: February 2026
APY data sourced from Sanctum. Rates fluctuate - always verify current yields before depositing.

Share this dispatch
№ viiContinue reading